Evaluation
The assignment will be evaluated based on
the following band descriptors - a total of 100 marks.
|
|
Beginning 1-5 |
Developing 6-10 |
Accomplished 11-15 |
Exemplary 16-20 |
Score |
|
Clarity e.g. language in newsletter, clear
presentation |
Most of the presentation is not clear |
Some parts of the presentation is not clear |
The presentation is general is clear and can be easily
understood |
The presentation is very clear and keeps the audience
attentive and focused |
20 |
|
Creativity e.g. unique way of presenting,
newsletter creation |
There is no evidence of creativity in presentation |
There are some efforts at adding creativity to the
presentation |
The presentation is highly creative |
The presentation is exceptional and innovative |
20 |
|
Collaboration e.g. every member playing a part in the group work |
There is no evidence of group collaboration |
There are few evidences of group collaboration |
There are some evidences of group collaboration |
There are many evidences of group collaboration |
20 |
|
|
Beginning 1-7 |
Developing 8-15 |
Accomplished 16-23 |
Exemplary 24-30 |
Score |
|
Content e.g. relevance of content. |
There is no evidence of content relevance. |
There are few evidences of content relevance. |
There are some evidences of content relevance. |
The content is highly relevant. |
|
|
|
Beginning 1-2 |
Developing 3-5 |
Accomplished 6-8 |
Exemplary 9-10 |
Score |
|
Care e.g. being considerate when other groups are
presenting and discussing their projects |
The is no evidence of consideration for other groups'
members |
There is few evidences of consideration for other groups'
members |
There is some evidences of consideration for other groups'
members |
There is many evidences of consideration for other groups'
members |
10 |